%PDF-1.3 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 14 0 R 25 0 R 38 0 R ] /Count 4 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R >> /XObject << /I1 11 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 595.280 841.890] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageC ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Creator (DOMPDF) /CreationDate (D:20141021092442+01'00') /ModDate (D:20141021092442+01'00') /Title (The Church of England and Christian Antiquity. The Construction of a Confessional Identity in the 17th Century) >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 12 0 R ] /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Length 2446 >> stream q 381.750 0 0 120.000 34.016 687.874 cm /I1 Do Q 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Published on )] TJ ET BT 99.356 676.469 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Reviews in History)] TJ ET BT 190.016 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( \()] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 197.012 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 197.012 675.075 m 357.332 675.075 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 357.332 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\))] TJ ET 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 34.391 653.743 526.499 1.500 re S BT 34.016 615.321 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(The Church of England and Christian Antiquity. The Construction )] TJ ET BT 34.016 593.937 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(of a Confessional Identity in the 17th Century)] TJ ET BT 34.016 266.195 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(This splendid study is part of the admirable Oxford-Warburg Studies series dedicated to the history of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 251.939 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(scholarship, under the general editorship of Charles Hope and Ian Maclean. It is to be hoped, however, that it )] TJ ET BT 34.016 237.683 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(receives a far wider readership than that location might suggest, as Quantin?s study has important )] TJ ET BT 34.016 223.427 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(contributions to make in a number of disparate fields.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 563.315 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Review Number:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 549.059 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(1092)] TJ ET BT 34.016 534.803 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Publish date:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 520.547 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Wednesday, 1 June, 2011)] TJ ET BT 34.016 506.291 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Author:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 492.035 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Jean-Louis Quantin)] TJ ET BT 34.016 477.779 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(ISBN:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 463.523 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(9780199557868)] TJ ET BT 34.016 449.267 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Date of Publication:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 435.011 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(2009)] TJ ET BT 34.016 420.755 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Price:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 406.499 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(98.00)] TJ ET BT 34.016 392.243 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Pages:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 377.987 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(496pp.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 363.731 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Publisher:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 349.475 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Oxford University Press)] TJ ET BT 34.016 335.219 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Place of Publication:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 320.963 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Oxford)] TJ ET BT 34.016 306.707 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Reviewer:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 292.451 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Peter Webster)] TJ ET endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 509 /Height 160 /Filter /FlateDecode /DecodeParms << /Predictor 15 /Colors 3 /Columns 509 /BitsPerComponent 8>> /Mask [ 255 255 255 255 255 255 ] /ColorSpace /DeviceRGB /BitsPerComponent 8 /Length 3280>> stream x[EQ㎦fVttҒ +3O{?lGDQԯDrB^.ϯ%~'0۠/2>0AG_>0j0GCfE67>rB^}@  !&y+r?INp:erc b8f=rQC!~-Wf^^zF[)G 2ޯe7V_Go3Ke GEGOo8rώ#\1ZY~N6^H}yLxS-!:412V+u\-LSO?xVvZ|GjǮT_8EYJF=Tw^ 7GxfN/S:Ʌ~ʟtt?5n÷J'JcF-GVξx{rO~tJd;#a\7}|~y'>}c2C vR}f׈**h.)_&@pfzjsx:5;S\vKhM5j=!Cn+h"u]a EUN]jn=k<,:Ք>sU!ni~6EJ)¦72?G}[y}_vc$t?iSܟ2Zݞ,VN?_`='RFK1A2qv&X_lLRWY'%:I㢖zb_UEx\>&ɆBˏ~K@ \gYØU4}$8Dv!'Q'*+Εj(UCGo[#< 2Ja(sZi9fZKE Rn`u\9r^Zmɯ׹}mstO4uc~#'jEvۼ Dx[z ޏQ4KL5,5u3>i^uÒ-53ba ~,~/pyt1fMU'CVm:qv~=Y'Es"WsφG?l_kN5}],Ow7 uh`xƫ?zMl7ٻv$A(4Dl(wwH} ?=[=S;yC]^BK>㕪9`Z'Wj;E|:bf>kCԘ#RY,iv쵗~}n'"1u" *uO΄/2^Sxr(!/DD\~mJyZ!MmrA!#u[if|99WB WΡpp}w}sh#,\ &:%˳X?D3 %W0cC?o̲^} F3XLVn]Cߖiϧ!7}yZJ#P7]=)7Ρp;>> Ye^xx{Oafw{ ;>4gfLt ʊ:q%#r/)pv!O4wGh|dS ӣݽހ-gVUC'pBxrB^} 7JA^} /'8!`:r?}}],X  }6y!`/~Br?}Q< >k7vx"] ,' .3jn{-i}|~%-};b6#U)7繎kiEw 㤳:E}[޼c"rꬊ7Dc$~"/Y&zSd:tFȌCrʙ`7u .#[-<)j ?TGS(j~oTup(hjU4PlJ=}|it.ҽ@\wʨuXÞZcx18Wo<~ikOg,ވ\^?EneyZcc0[R١z|zv7_m:_n]a?osS3~j^ hD.a_X'KfBX6w wݶ"Oa:,bvhrWH[uCF-Xfc}>x+Rz)2N-B 7y^٨;[/vg? | |2Sve}=o䑰j[vWjF0{굦?VI~}xM(_TlG__+]:#к?S} c>GŸD7 !w{S{B =x7a?oE#)+Gz:o_4Q<;n?\tt7?mGCџQGu4kņOF>F?#} hP&ђߴM#u!.СtL2^#o nIk_i.~7tr@n 1P~3?.[]=S5b߮~Yo^HFH YBi8a4iom>CKgMy*;?zqEӕ` >zB9iFzC?XF?ޟIܰ펉A}{I5ᄊx%ez#Mp@rߎpi]IOVjzuJt\۰f׺u5><,J~PTJp1)}){9N {!`/> endstream endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 13 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 197.0117 675.3895 357.3317 687.2695 ] >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI (http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews) >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 17 0 R 20 0 R 23 0 R ] /Contents 15 0 R >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Length 7834 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 784.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Building on a formidable body of work on patristic reception in continental Europe, and in France in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 770.213 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(particular, this is the most substantial work thus far from Quantin?s pen on England in English. It was )] TJ ET BT 34.016 755.957 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(foreshadowed in part by an important 1997 contribution to a collection of essays on the reception of the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 741.701 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Fathers, edited in two volumes by Irena Backus; one of the few landmarks in a still sparsely populated )] TJ ET BT 34.016 727.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(scholarly landscape.)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 131.324 727.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(1\))] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 131.324 726.051 m 145.316 726.051 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 145.316 727.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( Its subject is the reception of the writings of the Fathers of the Christian church in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 713.189 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(England, and despite the subtitle it covers the period from Thomas Cranmer into the early 18th century. The )] TJ ET BT 34.016 698.933 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(work is built upon a monumental foundation of bibliographical scholarship and, along the way, it makes )] TJ ET BT 34.016 684.677 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(telling contributions to our knowledge of that field. It also makes useful and intriguing observations on the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 670.421 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(development of scholarly method in general, and on the curriculum of the English universities. These areas, )] TJ ET BT 34.016 656.165 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(suggestive though they are, are not however its prime concern, which is the authority attributed to the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Fathers in theological controversy and their use in constructions of Anglican identity more widely.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 615.653 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(For generations of Anglo-Catholic commentators on the Church of England, the use of the term Anglican in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 601.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(relation to the Elizabethan and Stuart churches would have caused no discomfort. Drawing on an )] TJ ET BT 34.016 587.141 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(interpretation given its shape by the preoccupations of the Oxford Movement, these apologists located )] TJ ET BT 34.016 572.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Anglican identity in an delicate and somewhat elusive balance between scripture, reason and tradition, of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 558.629 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(which the Fathers were part. Inherent in the Elizabethan settlement itself, this trinity of interlocking and )] TJ ET BT 34.016 544.373 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(mutually interpreting sources of authority was, according to this analysis, drawn out progressively more )] TJ ET BT 34.016 530.117 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(fully by Richard Hooker and Lancelot Andrewes and others. As Quantin observes in the introduction, such a )] TJ ET BT 34.016 515.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(reading has now waned as ecclesiastical history, at least in its older institutionally-focussed form, has both )] TJ ET BT 34.016 501.605 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(moved further towards the scholarly margins and by and large shed its presentist preoccupations. That being )] TJ ET BT 34.016 487.349 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(said, some echoes of this view of Anglican origins may still be heard in more recent general works, and one )] TJ ET BT 34.016 473.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(of the merits of Quantin?s study is the considerable damage it does to lingering notions of Anglican )] TJ ET BT 34.016 458.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(exceptionalism within the wider Church.)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 229.664 458.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(2\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 229.664 457.443 m 243.656 457.443 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 432.581 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The narrative of change that Quantin presents is a complex one, tightly interwoven with the course of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 418.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(ecclesiastical politics. As such it is in sympathy with trends in recent writing on the period which has )] TJ ET BT 34.016 404.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(stressed the polemical contingency of positions that scholars once regarded as more fixed )] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 466.268 404.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(3\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 466.268 402.675 m 480.260 402.675 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 480.260 404.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(; positions that )] TJ ET BT 34.016 389.813 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(were peculiarly unstable in the Church of England since the Other against which they were defined wore )] TJ ET BT 34.016 375.557 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(alternatively Catholic or Calvinist masks \(p. 404\). English divines under Elizabeth did indeed regularly cite )] TJ ET BT 34.016 361.301 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the Fathers as proof-texts in debate under certain circumstances. At base, however, the English church )] TJ ET BT 34.016 347.045 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(differed little from continental Reformed churches in its ultimate subjection of patristic authority to that of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 332.789 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Scripture. If figures such as John Jewel appeared in debate to place the Fathers on an equal footing with )] TJ ET BT 34.016 318.533 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Scripture, it was due to the unstable polemical circumstances of the moment, rather than to any more )] TJ ET BT 34.016 304.277 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(fundamental understanding. The Fathers were useful witnesses to the truth of Scripture and sometimes an aid )] TJ ET BT 34.016 290.021 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(to its interpretation; but the polemical contest with Catholic apologists meant that attempts to give the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 275.765 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(patristic witness any sort of autonomous status as a source of authority had to be resisted.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 249.509 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(In chapters two and three, Quantin detects the beginning of a profound shift in the last years of Elizabeth?s )] TJ ET BT 34.016 235.253 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(reign and under James I; but one that occurred as a result of several discrete developments. Hooker may be )] TJ ET BT 34.016 220.997 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(said to have cleared away some barriers to a higher view of tradition, but without ever asserting such a view )] TJ ET BT 34.016 206.741 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(himself. Many divines now associated with the Oxford anti-Calvinism of the 1590s, including Hadrian )] TJ ET BT 34.016 192.485 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Saravia, Thomas Bilson, John Overall and Lancelot Andrewes all appear in a narrative of growing )] TJ ET BT 34.016 178.229 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(estrangement from continental Calvinism over doctrinal issues such as the descent of Christ into hell and the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 163.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(cessation of miracles. Under William Laud, this disillusionment with Reformed thought was transposed into )] TJ ET BT 34.016 149.717 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(a higher, more combative key, until in figures such as Richard Montagu and John Pocklington the Church of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 135.461 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(England seemed to have at least some apologists for a very catholic understanding of tradition indeed. )] TJ ET BT 34.016 121.205 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(However, as chapter four demonstrates, it yet required the shocks of 1642?60 to make the Fathers a central )] TJ ET BT 34.016 106.949 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(part of Anglican apologetics.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 80.693 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(To be sure, the fluidity of thought during the caesura of civil war and Interregnum did see a marked swing )] TJ ET BT 34.016 66.437 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(away from the Fathers, but for different reasons. The period saw a resurgent Puritan scripturalism, more )] TJ ET BT 34.016 52.181 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(rigid than even under Edward VI; and Quantin is most enlightening on the influence of the work of the )] TJ ET endstream endobj 16 0 obj [14 0 R /Fit] endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 18 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 131.3237 726.3655 145.3157 738.2455 ] >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /Action >> endobj 19 0 obj [14 0 R /Fit] endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 21 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 229.6637 457.7575 243.6557 469.6375 ] >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Action >> endobj 22 0 obj [14 0 R /Fit] endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 24 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 466.2677 402.9895 480.2597 414.8695 ] >> endobj 24 0 obj << /Type /Action >> endobj 25 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 28 0 R 30 0 R 32 0 R 34 0 R 36 0 R ] /Contents 26 0 R >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Length 7983 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 796.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(French Calvinist Jean Daill and his )] TJ ET BT 210.668 796.469 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Traict)] TJ ET BT 240.008 796.469 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [( de l?employ des Saincts Peres)] TJ ET BT 393.644 796.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, first published in Geneva in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 782.213 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(1631. Although far from puritan in temper, the gradual publication of the more exploratory work from the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 767.957 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(circle of scholars associated with Great Tew, such as that of William Chillingworth and John Hales, also )] TJ ET BT 34.016 753.701 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(eroded the status of the Fathers. This was part of an intellectual project tending towards a church of the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 739.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(?utmost doctrinal latitude? \(p. 228\) and one that found echoes in the later work of Jeremy Taylor.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 713.189 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Despite these trends, there were greater forces at work before 1660 that pushed Anglican apologists in the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 698.933 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(opposite direction. The restored Church of England had a profound sense of being assailed from both Roman )] TJ ET BT 34.016 684.677 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Catholic apologists abroad and from radical Dissenters at home. Nourished by the fruits of a peculiarly )] TJ ET BT 34.016 670.421 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(fertile period in scholarship in the University of Oxford, it was natural that Anglican writers should develop )] TJ ET BT 34.016 656.165 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(an increasingly self-confident apology for episcopacy as an essential part of church polity, and a view of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(tradition that marked out clear divisions between the Church of England and both Rome and Dissent. By this )] TJ ET BT 34.016 627.653 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(time, there was a new synthesis that may reasonably be termed ?Anglicanism? \(p. 398\).The high-water mark )] TJ ET BT 34.016 613.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(was reached with the development by both Henry Dodwell and Herbert Thorndike of highly idiosyncratic )] TJ ET BT 34.016 599.141 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(theories of the nature of tradition, as described in chapter six. Although neither system was very widely )] TJ ET BT 34.016 584.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(influential before the 1690s, they represent the most successful attempts to develop a distinctively Anglican )] TJ ET BT 34.016 570.629 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(theory of the nature of patristic authority. The story ends, however, with the new emphasis on the Fathers by )] TJ ET BT 34.016 556.373 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Anglican apologists provoking an acutely dangerous reaction against Christian tradition as a whole amongst )] TJ ET BT 34.016 542.117 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(freethinkers in the 18th century: ?Antiquity proved a Pandora?s box? \(p. 407\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 515.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Such is an inadequate sketch of a complex, imposing yet wholly convincing study. Quantin manages to hold )] TJ ET BT 34.016 501.605 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(together an account of the materials and temper of patristic scholarship with the polemical context that both )] TJ ET BT 34.016 487.349 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(shaped and was shaped by it. The book is integrated with the history of continental theology to a degree )] TJ ET BT 34.016 473.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(rarely achieved by scholars of the English church.)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 273.956 473.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(4\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 273.956 471.699 m 287.948 471.699 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 287.948 473.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( It is also acutely observant of the degree to which the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 458.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(weight given to the Fathers was socially positioned. The barriers to access of the latest scholarship acted as a )] TJ ET BT 34.016 444.581 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(firewall against socially subversive enthusiasm; religious truth, especially after 1660, was best dispensed by )] TJ ET BT 34.016 430.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(?professionals, who had acquired esoteric knowledge through a lengthy apprenticeship? \(p. 406\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 404.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Supported by an imposing bibliography in multiple languages, this study is likely to remain the starting-)] TJ ET BT 34.016 389.813 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(point for further enquiry into the subject for many years. It ought to be of interest to historians of the English )] TJ ET BT 34.016 375.557 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(church, but also of theology, of scholarly method and of the universities. It deserves also to be noticed by )] TJ ET BT 34.016 361.301 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(those contemporary theologians concerned with the nature of the Anglican church, further denting as it does )] TJ ET BT 34.016 347.045 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the notion of Anglican exceptionalism, at least in the 16th and early 17th centuries.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 312.147 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(Notes)] TJ ET BT 48.816 281.530 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(1.)] TJ ET BT 64.016 281.525 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(?The Fathers in Sevententh-Century Anglican Theology?, in )] TJ ET BT 357.308 281.525 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(The Reception of the Church Fathers in )] TJ ET BT 64.016 267.269 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(the West. From the Carolingians to the Maurists)] TJ ET BT 297.356 267.269 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, ed. Irena Backus \(Leiden, 1997\), ii, pp. 987-1008. )] TJ ET BT 64.016 253.013 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(See the bibliography of the volume under review for further works, in French, on Henry Dodwell, )] TJ ET BT 64.016 238.757 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Daniel Whitby and others.)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 190.664 238.757 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Back to \(1\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 190.664 237.363 m 244.652 237.363 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 48.816 224.506 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(2.)] TJ ET BT 64.016 224.501 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(See, amongst many, H. R. McAdoo, )] TJ ET BT 241.004 224.501 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(The Spirit of Anglicanism. A Survey of Anglican Theological )] TJ ET BT 64.016 210.245 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Method in the Seventeenth Century)] TJ ET BT 232.652 210.245 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( \(London, 1965\); )] TJ ET BT 317.312 210.245 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(The English Religious Tradition and the Genius )] TJ ET BT 64.016 195.989 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(of Anglicanism)] TJ ET BT 136.352 195.989 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, ed. Geoffrey Rowell \(Wantage, 1992\).)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 327.296 195.989 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Back to \(2\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 327.296 194.595 m 381.284 194.595 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 48.816 181.738 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(3.)] TJ ET BT 64.016 181.733 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(See, for example, Peter Lake and Michael Questier, ?Introduction? to )] TJ ET BT 400.268 181.733 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Conformity and Orthodoxy in )] TJ ET BT 64.016 167.477 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(the English Church, c.1560-1660)] TJ ET BT 223.676 167.477 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, ed. Lake and Questier \(Woodbridge, 2000\),pp. Ix?xx.)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 487.280 167.477 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Back to \(3\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 487.280 166.083 m 541.268 166.083 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 48.816 153.226 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(4.)] TJ ET BT 64.016 153.221 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(For another work that succeeds in achieving such integration, see Anthony Milton, )] TJ ET BT 463.964 153.221 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Catholic and )] TJ ET BT 64.016 138.965 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Reformed. The Roman and Protestant Churches in English Protestant Thought, 1600?1640)] TJ ET BT 64.016 124.709 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(Cambridge, 1995\).)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 158.336 124.709 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Back to \(4\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 158.336 123.315 m 212.324 123.315 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 98.453 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The author thanks Dr Webster for his generous review and has no comments to make.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 72.197 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Other reviews:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 57.941 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [([2])] TJ ET 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 34.391 53.215 526.499 1.500 re S endstream endobj 27 0 obj [25 0 R /Fit] endobj 28 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 29 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 273.9557 472.0135 287.9477 483.8935 ] >> endobj 29 0 obj << /Type /Action >> endobj 30 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 31 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 190.6637 237.6775 244.6517 249.5575 ] >> endobj 31 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /GoTo /D 16 0 R >> endobj 32 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 33 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 327.2957 194.9095 381.2837 206.7895 ] >> endobj 33 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /GoTo /D 19 0 R >> endobj 34 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 35 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 487.2797 166.3975 541.2677 178.2775 ] >> endobj 35 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /GoTo /D 22 0 R >> endobj 36 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 37 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 158.3357 123.6295 212.3237 135.5095 ] >> endobj 37 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /GoTo /D 27 0 R >> endobj 38 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 40 0 R ] /Contents 39 0 R >> endobj 39 0 obj << /Length 552 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 796.469 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Source URL:)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 104.672 796.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/1092)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 104.672 795.075 m 328.316 795.075 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 770.098 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Links:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 755.698 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [([1] http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/item/5524)] TJ ET BT 34.016 741.298 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [([2] http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews)] TJ ET endstream endobj 40 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 41 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 104.6717 795.3895 328.3157 807.2695 ] >> endobj 41 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI (http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/1092) >> endobj xref 0 42 0000000000 65535 f 0000000008 00000 n 0000000073 00000 n 0000000119 00000 n 0000000342 00000 n 0000000379 00000 n 0000000613 00000 n 0000000695 00000 n 0000003193 00000 n 0000003302 00000 n 0000003412 00000 n 0000003521 00000 n 0000007082 00000 n 0000007210 00000 n 0000007294 00000 n 0000007392 00000 n 0000015279 00000 n 0000015309 00000 n 0000015437 00000 n 0000015473 00000 n 0000015503 00000 n 0000015631 00000 n 0000015667 00000 n 0000015697 00000 n 0000015825 00000 n 0000015861 00000 n 0000015973 00000 n 0000024009 00000 n 0000024039 00000 n 0000024167 00000 n 0000024203 00000 n 0000024331 00000 n 0000024386 00000 n 0000024514 00000 n 0000024569 00000 n 0000024697 00000 n 0000024752 00000 n 0000024880 00000 n 0000024935 00000 n 0000025019 00000 n 0000025623 00000 n 0000025751 00000 n trailer << /Size 42 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R >> startxref 25847 %%EOF