%PDF-1.3 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 14 0 R 19 0 R 21 0 R 23 0 R ] /Count 5 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R >> /XObject << /I1 11 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 595.280 841.890] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageC ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Creator (DOMPDF) /CreationDate (D:20140417105934+01'00') /ModDate (D:20140417105934+01'00') /Title (Dialogus de Scaccario, and Constitutio Domus Regis/The Dialogue of the Exchequer, and The Establishment of the Royal Household) >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 12 0 R ] /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Length 4499 >> stream q 381.750 0 0 120.000 34.016 687.874 cm /I1 Do Q 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Published on )] TJ ET BT 99.356 676.469 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Reviews in History)] TJ ET BT 190.016 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( \()] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 197.012 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 197.012 675.075 m 357.332 675.075 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 357.332 676.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\))] TJ ET 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 34.391 653.743 526.499 1.500 re S BT 34.016 615.321 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(Dialogus de Scaccario, and Constitutio Domus Regis/The Dialogue )] TJ ET BT 34.016 593.937 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(of the Exchequer, and The Establishment of the Royal Household)] TJ ET BT 34.016 251.939 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The present volume marks the latest in a succession of modern editions and/or translations of Richard )] TJ ET BT 34.016 237.683 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(fitzNigel's )] TJ ET BT 86.504 237.683 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogus de Scaccario)] TJ ET BT 195.824 237.683 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( and the )] TJ ET BT 236.816 237.683 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio Domus Regis)] TJ ET BT 356.828 237.683 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, stretching back in the case of the former )] TJ ET BT 34.016 223.427 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(to the edition by A. Hughes, C. G. Crump, and C. Johnson published in 1902. Most obviously it is the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 209.171 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(successor to the volume containing both works published by Charles Johnson in the Nelson's Medieval Texts )] TJ ET BT 34.016 194.915 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(series in 1950, and reissued as an Oxford Medieval Text in 1983 with very limited modifications by F. E. L. )] TJ ET BT 34.016 180.659 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Carter and D. E. Greenway. The current volume has entirely new introductory material, what its editors )] TJ ET BT 34.016 166.403 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(describe as 'freshly collated and arranged' Latin texts and new translations and notes. The )] TJ ET BT 465.908 166.403 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogus)] TJ ET BT 509.912 166.403 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( is much )] TJ ET BT 34.016 152.147 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the longer text, an administrative manual written by Henry II's treasurer Richard fitzNigel. It provides an )] TJ ET BT 34.016 137.891 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(excellent description and discussion of exchequer procedure in the last years of Henry's reign. The much )] TJ ET BT 34.016 123.635 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(shorter )] TJ ET BT 70.340 123.635 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio Domus Regis)] TJ ET BT 190.352 123.635 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( consists of a list of allowances payable to members of the royal household. )] TJ ET BT 34.016 109.379 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Its compiler cannot be identified, and it is generally dated to c.1136.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 83.123 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Emilie Amt's introduction to the )] TJ ET BT 191.852 83.123 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogus)] TJ ET BT 235.856 83.123 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( concentrates primarily on the establishment of the text, involving )] TJ ET BT 34.016 68.867 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(some consideration of the process of writing, and on exchequer procedure. To the latter she provides an )] TJ ET BT 34.016 54.611 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(excellent introductory account that should be widely read. As to the text, she points out that there is no )] TJ ET BT 34.016 563.315 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Review Number:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 549.059 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(653)] TJ ET BT 34.016 534.803 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Publish date:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 520.547 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Monday, 31 March, 2008)] TJ ET BT 34.016 506.291 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Editor:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 492.035 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Emilie Amt)] TJ ET BT 34.016 477.779 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Stephen Church)] TJ ET BT 34.016 463.523 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(ISBN:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 449.267 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(9780199258611)] TJ ET BT 34.016 435.011 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Date of Publication:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 420.755 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(2007)] TJ ET BT 34.016 406.499 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Price:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 392.243 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(85.00)] TJ ET BT 34.016 377.987 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Pages:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 363.731 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(312pp.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 349.475 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Publisher:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 335.219 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Oxford University Press)] TJ ET BT 34.016 320.963 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Place of Publication:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 306.707 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Oxford)] TJ ET BT 34.016 292.451 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Reviewer:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 278.195 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(J. G. H. Hudson)] TJ ET endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 509 /Height 160 /Filter /FlateDecode /DecodeParms << /Predictor 15 /Colors 3 /Columns 509 /BitsPerComponent 8>> /Mask [ 255 255 255 255 255 255 ] /ColorSpace /DeviceRGB /BitsPerComponent 8 /Length 3280>> stream x[EQ㎦fVttҒ +3O{?lGDQԯDrB^.ϯ%~'0۠/2>0AG_>0j0GCfE67>rB^}@  !&y+r?INp:erc b8f=rQC!~-Wf^^zF[)G 2ޯe7V_Go3Ke GEGOo8rώ#\1ZY~N6^H}yLxS-!:412V+u\-LSO?xVvZ|GjǮT_8EYJF=Tw^ 7GxfN/S:Ʌ~ʟtt?5n÷J'JcF-GVξx{rO~tJd;#a\7}|~y'>}c2C vR}f׈**h.)_&@pfzjsx:5;S\vKhM5j=!Cn+h"u]a EUN]jn=k<,:Ք>sU!ni~6EJ)¦72?G}[y}_vc$t?iSܟ2Zݞ,VN?_`='RFK1A2qv&X_lLRWY'%:I㢖zb_UEx\>&ɆBˏ~K@ \gYØU4}$8Dv!'Q'*+Εj(UCGo[#< 2Ja(sZi9fZKE Rn`u\9r^Zmɯ׹}mstO4uc~#'jEvۼ Dx[z ޏQ4KL5,5u3>i^uÒ-53ba ~,~/pyt1fMU'CVm:qv~=Y'Es"WsφG?l_kN5}],Ow7 uh`xƫ?zMl7ٻv$A(4Dl(wwH} ?=[=S;yC]^BK>㕪9`Z'Wj;E|:bf>kCԘ#RY,iv쵗~}n'"1u" *uO΄/2^Sxr(!/DD\~mJyZ!MmrA!#u[if|99WB WΡpp}w}sh#,\ &:%˳X?D3 %W0cC?o̲^} F3XLVn]Cߖiϧ!7}yZJ#P7]=)7Ρp;>> Ye^xx{Oafw{ ;>4gfLt ʊ:q%#r/)pv!O4wGh|dS ӣݽހ-gVUC'pBxrB^} 7JA^} /'8!`:r?}}],X  }6y!`/~Br?}Q< >k7vx"] ,' .3jn{-i}|~%-};b6#U)7繎kiEw 㤳:E}[޼c"rꬊ7Dc$~"/Y&zSd:tFȌCrʙ`7u .#[-<)j ?TGS(j~oTup(hjU4PlJ=}|it.ҽ@\wʨuXÞZcx18Wo<~ikOg,ވ\^?EneyZcc0[R١z|zv7_m:_n]a?osS3~j^ hD.a_X'KfBX6w wݶ"Oa:,bvhrWH[uCF-Xfc}>x+Rz)2N-B 7y^٨;[/vg? | |2Sve}=o䑰j[vWjF0{굦?VI~}xM(_TlG__+]:#к?S} c>GŸD7 !w{S{B =x7a?oE#)+Gz:o_4Q<;n?\tt7?mGCџQGu4kņOF>F?#} hP&ђߴM#u!.СtL2^#o nIk_i.~7tr@n 1P~3?.[]=S5b߮~Yo^HFH YBi8a4iom>CKgMy*;?zqEӕ` >zB9iFzC?XF?ޟIܰ펉A}{I5ᄊx%ez#Mp@rߎpi]IOVjzuJt\۰f׺u5><,J~PTJp1)}){9N {!`/> endstream endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 13 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 197.0117 675.3895 357.3317 687.2695 ] >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI (http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews) >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 17 0 R ] /Contents 15 0 R >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Length 7251 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 796.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(original or early manuscript, but that there are four from the 13th century. She bases her edition on three of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 782.213 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(them, omitting London, British Library, Hargrave 313. This she sets aside because 'it contains no truly )] TJ ET BT 34.016 767.957 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(independent readings; it is also by far the most careless and error-ridden of the early manuscripts' \(p. xxix\). )] TJ ET BT 34.016 753.701 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(One minor drawback with this decision is that Hargrave 313 is included in the process of editing the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 739.445 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 87.368 739.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( in this same volume.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 713.189 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Of the three other manuscripts, none is clearly the most authoritative. She therefore bases her text on what )] TJ ET BT 34.016 698.933 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(she considers the best readings, with the aim of not omitting what may be original text. The 1902 editors )] TJ ET BT 34.016 684.677 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(rejected various passages as interpolations, but she wisely examines these individually, for example, )] TJ ET BT 34.016 670.421 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(distinguishing between addition and revision. She ends up by including the so-called interpolations, stating )] TJ ET BT 34.016 656.165 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(that 'I cannot argue that every bit of this material is Richard's own work, but I believe that the great majority )] TJ ET BT 34.016 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(of it is, and that its asynchronous nature is outweighed by its factual value' \(p. xxxiv\). Given the sometimes )] TJ ET BT 34.016 627.653 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(digressive nature of Richard's style and the uncertainty over the process whereby he reached his final text, )] TJ ET BT 34.016 613.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(such arguments are persuasive, as are those for the inclusion of the chapter titles and subtitles as Richard's )] TJ ET BT 34.016 599.141 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(own \(pp. xxxiv-vii\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 572.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Amt comments of Richard that:)] TJ ET BT 64.016 534.629 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(when he digresses into allegedly historical explanations, he is apt to exceed his knowledge or )] TJ ET BT 64.016 520.373 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(give muddled information, and when he pauses to expatiate on the greatness of Henry II or to )] TJ ET BT 64.016 506.117 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(draw what he hopes are elegant analogies, the reader may well wish he had instead devoted his )] TJ ET BT 64.016 491.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(efforts to telling us more about the exchequer \(p. xvii\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 453.605 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Although there would have been no risk of muddle or of exceeding of knowledge, Amt has followed her )] TJ ET BT 34.016 439.349 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(own advice to Richard and chosen not to range very widely in her introduction. There is little on Richard's )] TJ ET BT 34.016 425.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(learning or his style; indeed, on the latter her main statement is a quotation from the 1902 edition. More on )] TJ ET BT 34.016 410.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(these aspects might have been desirable, most notably as to why Richard chose the )] TJ ET BT 434.288 410.837 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogue)] TJ ET BT 478.952 410.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( form. He )] TJ ET BT 34.016 396.581 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(clearly was a writer with an interest in form, as he also composed a now lost history arranged in three )] TJ ET BT 34.016 382.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(columns: the first contained various matters concerning the English church and some decrees of the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 368.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Apostolic see in the first column; the glorious deeds of the aforesaid king, which exceed human belief, in the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 353.813 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(second; and various public and household matters, including judgements of the court, in the third.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 327.557 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Furthermore, Richard's style is not as plain as he promises in his prologue, and study, for example, of how )] TJ ET BT 34.016 313.301 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(he used biblical quotation and allusion would be interesting. At times he seems to resort to the Bible when )] TJ ET BT 34.016 299.045 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(he is concerned about justifying clerical participation in royal government, and the )] TJ ET BT 433.616 299.045 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogue)] TJ ET BT 478.280 299.045 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( is a vital source )] TJ ET BT 34.016 284.789 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(for our understanding of the ethos of Henry II's administrators \(see esp. p. 2\). It is notable, for instance, that )] TJ ET BT 34.016 270.533 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(he presents treasurer and sheriff as opponents at the exchequer. Nor is there comment on the passages where )] TJ ET BT 34.016 256.277 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Richard seems to criticise existing practice \(e.g. p. 158\), or where he records diversity of opinion \(e.g. pp. )] TJ ET BT 34.016 242.021 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(46, 176, 184\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 215.765 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(In this last respect, as in many others, he resembles the author of the )] TJ ET BT 364.628 215.765 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Tractatus de Legibus)] TJ ET BT 465.968 215.765 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, commonly )] TJ ET BT 34.016 201.509 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(known as Glanvill. A comparison of the two texts would have been illuminating, not only for understanding )] TJ ET BT 34.016 187.253 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(of Angevin administrative mentality. In addition, comparison of manuscripts might have produced further )] TJ ET BT 34.016 172.997 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(suggestions on the development of textual organisation, the presence of headings and of marginalia, and the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 158.741 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(problems of cross-referencing. It is conceivable, for example, that the possible failings of some of Richard's )] TJ ET BT 34.016 144.485 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(cross-references arise from restructurings undertaken by the author himself. At the same time comparison of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 130.229 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(manuscripts would emphasise a major difference between the histories of these two administrative manuals: )] TJ ET BT 34.016 115.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the )] TJ ET BT 51.680 115.973 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogue)] TJ ET BT 96.344 115.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( remained very much an exchequer text, the )] TJ ET BT 309.284 115.973 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Tractatus)] TJ ET BT 355.292 115.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( obtained a much wider readership. )] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 526.916 115.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(1\))] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 526.916 114.579 m 540.908 114.579 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 89.717 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Stephen Church in his introduction to the )] TJ ET BT 235.016 89.717 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Consitutio)] TJ ET BT 285.032 89.717 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( considers the possible development of the text, which in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 75.461 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(its present form probably dates from c.1136. He argues that 'embedded in this document are at least five )] TJ ET BT 34.016 61.205 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(discernible dates' \(p. xxxix\). These will take us back to a time when the chancellor was in constant )] TJ ET endstream endobj 16 0 obj [14 0 R /Fit] endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 18 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 526.9157 114.8935 540.9077 126.7735 ] >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /Action >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 20 0 R >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Length 4382 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 796.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(attendance on the king, and therefore received bread in his allowance \(p. xl\). He is not here arguing that the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 782.213 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 87.368 782.213 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( went through separate written redactions at all these dates, although he does allow the possibility )] TJ ET BT 34.016 767.957 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(that a written text was drawn up in the context of Henry I's household reforms in 1108 \(p. xli\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 741.701 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Church's introduction also discusses the development of the royal household, drawing upon English )] TJ ET BT 34.016 727.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(evidence and also that of Hincmar, archbishop of Reims. He argues \(p. l\) that one should not read the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 713.189 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio )] TJ ET BT 90.368 713.189 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [('in a rigid departmentalized way', and suggests that the departmental headings may be insertions )] TJ ET BT 34.016 698.933 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(in the text, made in the first half of the 13th century \(see also pp. lxii-lxiii\). Again, some brief comparison )] TJ ET BT 34.016 684.677 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(might have been interesting here, for example with the development of obedientiaries within monasteries )] TJ ET BT 34.016 670.421 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(and the growth of associated documentation; the fact that there were specific allocations of revenue or )] TJ ET BT 34.016 656.165 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(allowance, it would seem, need not mean that specific officials had very confined tasks. Perhaps in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(modification of Church's position one can take the )] TJ ET BT 278.816 641.909 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 332.168 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( as a departmentalised list without concluding )] TJ ET BT 34.016 627.653 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(that there was 'a departmentalized domus regis in which each man had his assigned role and no other' \(p. lii\).)] TJ ET BT 34.016 601.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Church then discusses the three 13th-century manuscripts of the )] TJ ET BT 344.300 601.397 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 397.652 601.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(. He bases his edition on the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 587.141 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Little Black Book of the Exchequer)] TJ ET BT 201.656 587.141 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(, noting variants in two other manuscripts, the Hargrave manuscript )] TJ ET BT 34.016 572.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(already mentioned and the )] TJ ET BT 163.988 572.885 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Red Book of the Exchequer)] TJ ET BT 294.620 572.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(. He notes the presence in the text of Latin words that )] TJ ET BT 34.016 558.629 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(are back-formations from Old French. This is an interesting early example of a practice also present in other )] TJ ET BT 34.016 544.373 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(12th-century administrative lists, for example one drawn up at Abingdon Abbey in the 1180s.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 518.117 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(In general the body of the Latin texts provided do not differ greatly from those in earlier editions, although )] TJ ET BT 34.016 503.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the fresh collation and arrangement does have definite benefits. Church's text of the )] TJ ET BT 438.092 503.861 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 491.444 503.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( is freed from )] TJ ET BT 34.016 489.605 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the very intrusive formatting that characterised the 1950/1983 text and translation. Very occasionally a )] TJ ET BT 34.016 475.349 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(different reading might have been preferred, as when a reading given as 'ut thesaurius' \(cf. Johnson's reading )] TJ ET BT 34.016 461.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [('ut Thesaurarius'\) in the favoured manuscript is privileged over the more obvious 'in thesauro' in the other )] TJ ET BT 34.016 446.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(two \(p. 206\). This reverses Johnson's editorial decision. For the )] TJ ET BT 341.144 446.837 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogus)] TJ ET BT 385.148 446.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( the very noticeable and welcome )] TJ ET BT 34.016 432.581 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(change is inclusion of a full apparatus criticus. In using the 1950/1983 edition, one had often had to return to )] TJ ET BT 34.016 418.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the 1902 edition for such material.)] TJ ET endstream endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 22 0 R >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Length 7715 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 784.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The translation of the )] TJ ET BT 140.000 784.469 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogus)] TJ ET BT 184.004 784.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( is in general somewhat closer to the Latin than was Johnson's version. This )] TJ ET BT 34.016 770.213 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(results in the removal of some overly interpretative translations. For example, at book one chapter seven 'et )] TJ ET BT 34.016 755.957 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(ratione dignitatis illius hec conferenda decernit, quibusdam hereditarie quibusdam personaliter' is translated )] TJ ET BT 34.016 741.701 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(as 'and to whom he has decided to grant these revenues by virtue of rank, either personally or hereditarily' )] TJ ET BT 34.016 727.445 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(rather than 'and to whom by reason of that dignity it decrees that these sums are to be granted, whether in fee )] TJ ET BT 34.016 713.189 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(or for life.' In other places, some over-interpretation may remain, as when in book two chapter ten 'fundus' is )] TJ ET BT 34.016 698.933 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(unnecessarily translated as 'fee' rather than 'estate'. Some minor changes of interpretation from the earlier )] TJ ET BT 34.016 684.677 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(translation are questionable. A passage on reliefs in the chapter just cited mentions 'Quidam enim de rege )] TJ ET BT 34.016 670.421 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(tenent in capite que ad coronam pertinent, baronias scilicet maiores seu minores.' Johnson rendered this as )] TJ ET BT 34.016 656.165 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [('for some of them hold crown lands of the King in chief, to wit, greater or lesser baronies.' Amt loses the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 641.909 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(reference to baronies, and their differentiation into greater and lesser, by rendering the passage 'For the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 627.653 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(greater and lesser barons hold crown lands in chief from the king.' Although translation of 'que' here requires )] TJ ET BT 34.016 613.397 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(some expansion, it seems unnecessary to move far from the literal translation, 'for some hold from the king )] TJ ET BT 34.016 599.141 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(in chief possessions which pertain to the crown, that is, greater or lesser baronies.' And again in the same )] TJ ET BT 34.016 584.885 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(chapter something may be lost in the translation of a passage concerning the relative wrongdoing of lay and )] TJ ET BT 34.016 570.629 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(clerical usurers: 'Laici enim, qui uoti necessitate minus tenentur, ampliorem gratiam promereri uidentur, )] TJ ET BT 34.016 556.373 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(sicut in peruersis actibus hii, qui uoto religionis inseruiunt, grauius offendunt.' Amt renders this 'laypersons, )] TJ ET BT 34.016 542.117 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(who are less bound by the restrictions of an oath, are considered more deserving of grace, just as those who )] TJ ET BT 34.016 527.861 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(live under a religious vow offend more seriously by sinning.' It seems a shame to lose the twin usage of )] TJ ET BT 34.016 513.605 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [('uotum' by translating one as 'oath' the other as 'vow', a stylistic point preserved in Johnson's translation )] TJ ET BT 34.016 499.349 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(which renders both as 'vows.' Another oddity of translation of a single word involves the phrase 'uoce )] TJ ET BT 34.016 485.093 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(preconia'. At pp. 126-7 'uoce preconia ... denuntiet' is translated as 'have it cried', whereas at pp. 174-5 'uoce )] TJ ET BT 34.016 470.837 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(preconia requistus' is translated as 'called by the herald'. However, all such issues are minor, and of the type )] TJ ET BT 34.016 456.581 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(that arise with any extended translation; Amt's provides a very good English version for those wishing to )] TJ ET BT 34.016 442.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(read the )] TJ ET BT 75.332 442.325 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Dialogue)] TJ ET BT 119.996 442.325 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 416.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The translation of the )] TJ ET BT 140.000 416.069 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(Constitutio)] TJ ET BT 193.352 416.069 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [( also raises some minor queries. It is not explained why 'simenellus' is )] TJ ET BT 34.016 401.813 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(translated as 'loaf of the king's bread', even when not accompanied by the adjective 'dominicus'. That )] TJ ET BT 34.016 387.557 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(adjective seems to differentiate high quality loaves from salted ones in the first entry, concerning the )] TJ ET BT 34.016 373.301 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(chancellor \(p. 196\). Regarding the chaplain keeper of the chapel and relics, the phrases 'corridium duorum )] TJ ET BT 34.016 359.045 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(hominum' and 'duplicem cibum' are both rendered 'double rations' \(p. 196\). The two surely were distinct in )] TJ ET BT 34.016 344.789 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(the mind of the compiler, and Johnson's literal translation of the first as 'corrody for two men' could have )] TJ ET BT 34.016 330.533 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(been retained. The phrase 'homini suo' is sometimes rendered 'for their man', sometimes 'for their men' \(p. )] TJ ET BT 34.016 316.277 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(202; cf. p. 206\). The buttery officers each received three pence for their men, rather than three pence for )] TJ ET BT 34.016 302.021 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(each of their men \(p. 204\). Given Henry I's paranoia about possible assassination, one may wonder whether )] TJ ET BT 34.016 287.765 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(he'd have allowed a man called Ralph the Robber into his hunting entourage; )] TJ ET BT 406.460 287.765 Td /F2 12.0 Tf [(English Historical Documents)] TJ ET BT 34.016 273.509 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(opts cautiously and perhaps wisely for retaining the original 'le Robeur' in inverted commas, whilst Johnson )] TJ ET BT 34.016 259.253 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(went for the bolder and more sartorial 'Ralf the Rober'.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 232.997 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Both texts are accompanied by useful commentaries in historical notes. A few problems occur with )] TJ ET BT 34.016 218.741 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(omissions of cross-references \(see e.g. pp. xxvi, 16, 18, 22, 54\), but in general it is easy to find one's way )] TJ ET BT 34.016 204.485 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(around the volume. Occasional notes are questionable; when referring to a 'more severe assize' \(p. 146\) )] TJ ET BT 34.016 190.229 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Richard fitzNigel probably had in mind the Assize of Northampton \(1176\) rather than that of Clarendon )] TJ ET BT 34.016 175.973 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(\(1166\). However, the notes are in general very helpful, and one might have liked more of them. For )] TJ ET BT 34.016 161.717 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(example, there is no comment on Richard's statement \(p. 93\) that 'if the woods are cut in such a way that )] TJ ET BT 34.016 147.461 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(someone standing by the trunk of a felled oak or other kind of tree and looking around can see five other )] TJ ET BT 34.016 133.205 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(felled trees, it is called "waste".' There are also some places where notes were present in the 1950/1983 )] TJ ET BT 34.016 118.949 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(version, but not in the present one; for example, regarding interesting reference to the account of the total )] TJ ET BT 34.016 104.693 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(revenue of the realm \(p. 36\). The frequent references especially to Pipe Rolls in the notes to the 1902 edition )] TJ ET BT 34.016 90.437 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(give that volume continuing value. However, the editors of the present volume are to be congratulated on )] TJ ET BT 34.016 76.181 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(presenting this valuable new edition and translation which merits considerable use.)] TJ ET endstream endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 3 0 R /Annots [ 25 0 R 27 0 R ] /Contents 24 0 R >> endobj 24 0 obj << /Length 1050 >> stream 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d BT 34.016 784.469 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(The editors are happy to accept this review and do not wish to comment further.)] TJ ET BT 34.016 749.571 Td /F3 18.0 Tf [(Notes)] TJ ET BT 48.816 718.954 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(1.)] TJ ET BT 64.016 718.949 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(See now S. C. Tullis, 'Glanvill after Glanvill', Oxford DPhil thesis, \(2007\). )] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 425.660 718.949 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(Back to \(1\))] TJ ET 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 425.660 717.555 m 479.648 717.555 l S 0.502 0.502 0.502 RG 0.75 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 34.391 702.223 526.499 1.500 re S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 684.443 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Source URL:)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 rg BT 104.672 684.443 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [(http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/653)] TJ ET 0.000 0.000 0.800 RG 0.24 w 0 J [ ] 0 d 104.672 683.049 m 322.316 683.049 l S 0.000 0.000 0.000 rg BT 34.016 658.072 Td /F3 12.0 Tf [(Links:)] TJ ET BT 34.016 643.672 Td /F1 12.0 Tf [([1] http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/item/3627)] TJ ET endstream endobj 25 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 26 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 425.6597 717.8695 479.6477 729.7495 ] >> endobj 26 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /GoTo /D 16 0 R >> endobj 27 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /A 28 0 R /Border [0 0 0] /H /I /Rect [ 104.6717 683.3635 322.3157 695.2435 ] >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI (http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/653) >> endobj xref 0 29 0000000000 65535 f 0000000008 00000 n 0000000073 00000 n 0000000119 00000 n 0000000349 00000 n 0000000386 00000 n 0000000636 00000 n 0000000718 00000 n 0000005269 00000 n 0000005378 00000 n 0000005488 00000 n 0000005597 00000 n 0000009158 00000 n 0000009286 00000 n 0000009370 00000 n 0000009454 00000 n 0000016758 00000 n 0000016788 00000 n 0000016916 00000 n 0000016952 00000 n 0000017017 00000 n 0000021452 00000 n 0000021517 00000 n 0000029285 00000 n 0000029376 00000 n 0000030479 00000 n 0000030607 00000 n 0000030662 00000 n 0000030790 00000 n trailer << /Size 29 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R >> startxref 30885 %%EOF