Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000, ISBN: 978033380452X; 501pp.
Date accessed: 28 March, 2017
In reviewing Mark Cornwall's monumental study of 'front propaganda by and against the Habsburg Monarchy in the First World War, I feel I ought to register a certain personal interest. In the summer of 1982, when I was embarking on my own doctoral research in the Vienna archives, I ran into Roy Bridge, leading expert in the diplomatic history of Austria-Hungary. Roy, always the soul of kindness, introduced me to Mark, one of his postgraduate students, whom he was initiating into the mysteries of the Haus-Hof-und Staatsarchiv, and who was remarkable (in my experience) for having a working acquaintance with both Serbo-Croat and Hungarian as well as German. For the last week or so of my stay that year, as I remember, Mark and I worked alongside one another in that peaceful little backroom of the Ballhaus. Together we also weathered an evening in the Zwölfapostelkeller with the unsinkable Dr. Bridge. The following summer, when I next visited Vienna, Mark was still there, having spent an entire year mining the archives, interspersed with forays into Hungary and former Yugoslavia in search of additional sources. A couple of years later I heard of Mark working under Zbynek Zeman and learning Czech into the bargain. In the course of the last decade and a half he has consolidated his reputation with an edited collection of articles on the break-up of the Habsburg Monarchy, and a string of solidly-crafted periodical articles on a wide range of subjects in and about his period.
I mention all this because it is a strange sensation reviewing a book at whose inception one was, after a fashion, present, for the current study is the product of Mark Cornwall's years of postgraduate toil in the archives of Central Europe. This is not to the book's discredit, but rather the contrary. Most transmogrified PhD theses, like Frankenstein's monster, show some signs of their origin, with a bolt sticking out here, the odd bit of stitching there, and a certain jerkiness in their mode of progression. There is none of that here. The Undermining of Austria-Hungary is a meticulously tidy, balanced and up-to-date piece of research, which in fact constitutes the best proof of why doing a PhD is the ultimate training for an historian. Like all former PhDs, it is enormously detailed; unlike many, the detail at no point obscures the overall story that is being told here, or the point of it all.
To cut to the chase: the subject of this book is the role played by propaganda in the demise of the Habsburg Monarchy, specifically in the last two years of the First World War, and specifically in the form of 'front propaganda', that is, material aimed directly at the front-line troops of one's opponents. It is a complicated topic, not least because the Monarchy was both a practitioner as well as a target of this type of offensive activity. After clearing the ground with a general discussion of propaganda, and an excellent chapter (of which more shortly) on the overall challenge facing Austria-Hungary in the War, Mark deals first with the Monarchy as practitioner, in two chapters on the propaganda campaigns against tsarist (later Bolshevik) Russia and Italy. The core of the book, however, is in the four huge chapters on the origins and course of the campaign waged by the Italians against the Monarchy in 1917-18. There is a wrap-up chapter showing how things unravelled for the Monarchy, in propaganda terms, in the fall of 1918; and a conclusion in which an attempt is made to gauge the contribution front propaganda made to the final disintegration.
Even as bald a summary as the above must give some idea of the wealth of sources, primary and secondary, on which this study necessarily rests. Mark has diligently trawled through the main Austrian archives, especially the War Archive, with its records from Army High Command down to regimental level. In Zagreb he has consulted the Croatian State Archive, but also the Archive of the Yugoslav Academy, which houses the crucially important papers of the Yugoslav Committee, the wartime assortment of South Slav émigrés who worked for the Habsburg Monarchy's destruction. Repositories in the Czech Republic have been pillaged for similar material, notably the papers of the Czechoslovak National Council. The Hungarian Military History Institute and the National Military History Museum have been used, particularly the latter's propaganda leaflet collection. And in Britain it is hard to imagine anything of significance which has been left out, from the Public Record Office to the Imperial War Museum, from the Northcliffe papers in the British Library to R.W. Seton-Watson's papers in the School of Slavonic & East European Studies.
A special mention should be made while on the subject of sources, of the sheer range of published material consulted, whether secondary, memoir or printed primary. Many of the most valuable insights of the book are derived from recently published collections of letters, diaries and so on, as well as recent scholarly monographs, many of them in Italian, Czech, Hungarian and other languages. Thus, the papers of Gaetano Salvemini, published in 1984, and those of Umberto Zanotti-Bianco (1987), have been used to good effect to amplify the story of Italy's propaganda campaign. Equally valuable are the eight-volume memoirs of the Slovene officer-deserter turned Allied propagandist, Ljudevit Pivko, and which appeared only ten years ago. Due account is taken of recent work in the general field of propaganda by scholars such as Ute Daniel, Wolfram Siemann, Maria Masau Dan and others. Altogether, by my reckoning Mark has utilised material in no fewer than nine different languages (not eight as intimated on Macmillan's dust-jacket). Even by the standards of the average Austria-Hungary freak, where this sort of polyglot catholicity is always prized and, to some extent, taken for granted, such conscientiousness surely sets some kind of record.
As far as content is concerned, what specific theses emerge from this massive exercise in empirical enquiry? Two in particular seem to me to stand out, and constitute the most original part of Mark's research. One is the centrality, as well as the autonomy, of the Italian effort in the propaganda war against Austria-Hungary. It is one of the central revelations of the book that, while the contributors to this offensive were eventually drawn from all the main Allied countries, and many of the Monarchy's own nationalities, the direction of it was very much an Italian affair. This amounts to yet another nail in the coffin of the 'Crewe House myth', the impression conveyed after the First World War by many of those involved in the British propaganda operation, such as Henry Wickham Steed, that 'Northcliffe propaganda' had been the main element in the Allied effort. More the product of wishful retrospective thinking than historical reality, the Crewe House myth was nevertheless accepted at face value not only by many in the West, but also by former German and Austro-Hungarian military and political leaders. The belief in an underhand and all-pervasive Allied subversion, masterminded by the Northcliffe press from perfidious Albion, was for many in the defeated countries, Hitler included, obviously more acceptable as an explanation of their downfall. That it was accepted for so long in the West is attributable, as Mark Cornwall shows, in part to the unwillingness of the Fascist regime in Italy to acknowledge propaganda, seen as somehow unmanly and dishonourable, as an important weapon in Italy's wartime arsenal. But it is also due to the inaccessibility, to Western scholars, of many of the key accounts of the propaganda conducted under Italian leadership, since so much of this literature is in Polish, or Czech, or Slovene. Unlocking this treasure-trove of evidence is one of the most noteworthy achievements of this book.
The second main contribution of the book is one that the author himself puts forward with some diffidence, but which I think is clear from the evidence offered. This is that, given certain caveats, and in a limited sense, the front propaganda against the Habsburg Monarchy worked. Of course, it took a long time for the leafleting campaigns, which is what most front propaganda amounted to, to show any obvious effects. As Mark is at pains to show, one of the great difficulties in measuring the effect of any propaganda, both at the time and with historical hindsight, is whether it was even read by its targets; given the questionable literacy of many Austro-Hungarian army conscripts, this is an important qualification. Leaflets picked up were often being harvested on the orders of commanders, anxious to limit their spread. Nor is it clear that many soldiers deserted to the Allies as a direct result of front propaganda, although some undoubtedly did. But the crucial factor, which is well brought out in this book, is that this steady, and increasingly sophisticated, psychological pressure was "pushing at an open door" (p. 439). It is a key requirement of any propaganda that it should fall on ground already fertile; and in this respect the Habsburg Monarchy in 1917-18 was a rich field. The multinational nature of the Monarchy meant that fighting a sustained war would always be a strain; the worse conditions got, the more likely dissent at home, on national grounds, was to appear. One of the most interesting aspects of this book is its demonstration of how, as political discontent in the Monarchy widened, and surfaced increasingly in a (relatively) open press, the propagandists in the Italian High Command started feeding this open criticism back to the Monarchy's troops via leaflets in multiple languages. It is also a truism that, for propaganda to work, there ought to be some kernel of truth, however small or distorted, embedded in it. Thus, when the military and political combination of circumstances were just right, in the fall of 1918, the constant barrage of front propaganda acted as a catalyst in prompting the literal disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Army. Although the vast majority of troops had obeyed orders and fought stubbornly for four years, there was no denying their divided loyalties. In this battle for hearts and minds, as Mark calls it, the Monarchy was bound to end up the loser if stretched far enough.
With regard to the substance of individual chapters, there is far more detail than can adequately be described even in the generous space allowed by Reviews in History. The second chapter, on "Austria-Hungary and the Control of Wartime Morale", is especially valuable as an analysis of the general dilemma facing the Monarchy. The hostilities presented the Monarchy itself with a clear opportunity to use propaganda against such vulnerable enemies as tsarist Russia and Italy; but the fact remained that the Monarchy was equally if not more vulnerable, given the existence of irredentist nation-states among its enemies, and claiming kinship with minorities in Austria-Hungary. Even more striking, however, is the extent to which the perception of vulnerability by authorities within the Monarchy shaped attitudes towards both the domestic population and the fighting troops. In their attempt to monitor and stamp out suspected subversion the civilian and military authorities exacerbated the disaffection which already existed among some nationalities, and arguably created it among other peoples where it had not hitherto been evident. Mark ably sketches the various organs created in each half of the Monarchy for this surveillance, and why ultimately they were likely to fail, especially once the political situation was gradually liberalised following the accession of the Emperor Charles. The military spin-off from this is also well told, in particular the vain attempt to counter the disaffection of soldiers from suspect nationalities by creating an increasing number of nationally mixed regiments, a solution which in terms of simple military efficiency was no solution at all.
The in-depth discussion of the Italian propaganda campaign (chapters 5-8), as mentioned, is the core of the book. Precisely because they are so detailed, these are a bit of a stiff read, though at all times clearly written, and mercifully free of jargon. There is in fact a great deal of interest here, from the expert analysis of Italy's wartime policy towards Austria-Hungary through to the often blow-by-blow description of individual incidents and phases of the propaganda war. One of the factors that makes the Italian campaign so intriguing is that, contrary to what many might imagine, the Italian government was not anxious to play the 'nationalities card' against the Habsburg Monarchy. Despite the agitation of irredentist nationalists, Italian policy, as enshrined in the secret Treaty of London of 1915, was essentially aimed at territorial expansion for its own sake; embracing the principle of national self-determination would necessitate renouncing territory much of which was inhabited by South Slavs. Mark is especially interesting on the resulting tensions in Italian front propaganda. On the one hand there were a dedicated number of soldiers, politicians and publicists who perceived the utility of being able to call on all the Monarchy's nationalities to question their allegiance to the Habsburgs. On the other hand, official Italian policy, as represented by the uneasy partnership of Vittorio Emanuele Orlando and Sidney Sonnino, took a long time to endorse the aspirations even of Czechs and Slovaks and Poles, and refused to the end fully to support the creation of a Yugoslavia. As Mark shows, this did not prevent the Italian propaganda machine from recruiting personnel from almost all the Monarchy's 'subject' nationalities, including South Slavs; but it did lead to unresolved differences and, in the particular case of propaganda aimed specifically at South Slav units, left an indelible question-mark hanging over its effectiveness.
In a book this long it would not be surprising if there were some minor errors of detail, not least in the voluminous notes appended to each chapter; but I have to say that I spotted none, with the piffling exception of an article (by Ivo Banac), which is referred to in chapter 5 (note 7), but is not listed in the bibliography.
The only two criticisms I can think of are also minor. Firstly: The opening chapter, "A Theory of Front Propaganda", strikes me as inaptly titled. If there is a theory of front propaganda being propounded here, even a nascent one, I don't see much evidence of it. Instead, this chapter offers, quite properly, a rationale for the research undertaken, and a very clear historiographical rundown of the literature on this subject, including some of the pioneering works on First World War propaganda such as that by Sanders and Taylor. Mark convincingly demonstrates here the originality of his work: there simply has not been until now any detailed study of either the Italian or the East European dimensions of front propaganda in this period, for the reasons alluded to earlier. What is more, Mark's book usefully corrects some of the mistaken interpretations about the leading role of the British in this field of warfare perpetuated by Sanders and Taylor themselves. None of this, however, constitutes a theory of front propaganda, nor is this any bad thing. Like all good historians, Mark has based his findings on solid, exhaustively detailed empirical research. He has not been overwhelmed by the evidence he has amassed, but has rather sifted it and compared it with previous work, as one should. Whether, at some point, and on the basis of his work to date, he wants to offer us a theory of how front propaganda works, is up to him. Personally, I think he could more profitably spend his time doing further research of this high quality. Personally (and to give 'history' its original meaning), I prefer the story to any theory. Precisely because of the human detail offered here, this is a very absorbing story indeed. It deserves to reach a wider audience than Macmillan's extortionate hardback prices will permit, so I devoutly hope a paperback edition is in the pipeline. Anyone interested in either the Habsburg Monarchy or the First World War will find this story a rewarding one.
Secondly, Mark has been ill-served by his publishers in one other respect, in that the quality and number of maps allotted to a study of this nature is scandalous. Given the detailed narrative in much of the book, a few general maps of the politico-military situation, but even more a series of large-scale front-line charts, would have made the whole thing much easier to follow. Call me simple-minded, but I for one like to know where I'm going. One can do without pictures (although the reproductions in this book of individual propaganda leaflets and cartoons are an excellent bonus), but it is infernally difficult to imagine even general historical events without maps. All the more important, then, to supply a military study like this with the right equipment.
To sum up on a more positive note: The Undermining of Austria-Hungary puts me in mind of that anecdote at the start of C.A. Macartney's magisterial history of the Habsburg Monarchy, where he relates commenting on the absence of such a history to A.F. Pribram in the 1920s, and being told that 'everyone' noticed the gap, but gave up trying it themselves because they 'didn't have eleven languages'. (I paraphrase.) Not only does Mark Cornwall have the answer to the Pribram test, but also he has told a complex story well, and illuminated a hitherto only dimly understood aspect of the First World War.
Many thanks to Ian Armour for his generous and meticulous reading of my monograph. While commenting briefly on the review I want to highlight some extra dimensions, at the core of the book's argument, which indicate a variety of ways in which it may be used by other historians.
The main thrust of the monograph is indeed an exploration of the 'weapon of propaganda' as it affected the Habsburg Empire in the First World War. There has been no comparable analysis of this phenomenon on any front in the Great War. This justifies the detail, all the more so in view of the range of central European archives consulted. Ian Armour rightly underlines a central thesis of the book. It is to adjust the British-focused historiography; and to reveal, through the fullest study of the Italian front that we now have in English, the importance of Italy's contribution to the 'science' of front propaganda. If this is at odds with a traditional stereotype of Italian military incompetence, it was a natural derivative from the Italians' own wartime dealings with the Austro-Hungarian army. My study gives particular attention to the Italian campaign of 1918, as the most sophisticated of its kind and the one where western historiography has needed serious adjustment. I argue, however, that the notion of a concerted and 'modern' psychological campaign, with carefully worked-out arguments and objectives, was first pursued by the Central Powers in 1917. The psychological offensives launched by Austria-Hungary against Russia, Serbia and Italy in 1917 are completely absent from the historiography in any language. Chapters 3 and 4 of the book go far in filling this omission and deserve to be highlighted. They show how the Austrian military in 1917 was surprisingly innovative and flexible in quickly treating the 'new' weapon of front propaganda with some respect. While many old soldiers still viewed it as unchivalrous, it seemed to be reaping rewards, not least in its alleged contribution to the Russian army's disintegration. Whatever the truth of that claim, the Habsburg war machine learnt important lessons from its Russian campaign and hoped for a similar psychological success against Italy. The use of front propaganda snowballed in this way, stirring a response in the West in late 1917, and evolving into the tighter ideological campaigns of 1918.
Following from this, I would take issue with one element of Ian Armour's review. He is sceptical about the need for any 'theory of front propaganda' and, indeed, implies that the book does not offer one anyway. It is true that the introductory chapter is primarily a historiographical survey. Yet from the start it supplies some ideas about why modern front propaganda emerged when it did. It then shows how and why our understanding of its practice in the European framework has been distorted in the historiography. In other words, there has for decades existed a disjointed interpretation of front propaganda which the book sets out to correct. The subsequent chapters not only build up a new interpretation based on fresh evidence. They indicate that the practitioners on both sides of the front gradually developed what one might term a 'science' of front propaganda, learning lessons and rules about how the weapon could best be employed in their theatre. In my final chapter, I bring together these threads from the different campaigns to show that there was indeed a certain 'theory of front propaganda' which contemporary practitioners came to understand. This concluding analysis also provides historians with a clearer framework within which to think about the potential, the exercise and the limitations of this weapon. The book would be failing if it did not, alongside its firm evidential base, supply some theoretical framework for assessing front propaganda on the one hand, and the disintegration of the Habsburg Empire on the other.
For it is through the prism of front propaganda that a second issue is examined: the nature of Austria-Hungary's wartime dissolution. The broad context is available through my other writings, notably the forthcoming revised edition of The Last Years of Austria-Hungary: A Multinational Experiment in Early Twentieth Century Europe (University of Exeter Press, 2002). In the monograph, the emphasis is upon how ideas from outside the Monarchy penetrated and increasingly interacted with mounting domestic agitation and the spread of poisonous ideas. The authorities' failure to meet this challenge is assessed fully in chapter 7, particularly (and for the first time) in terms of the vain efforts at Habsburg 'patriotic instruction' in the army. The reader can also, through the book's detailed index, explore the ideological threat to the Habsburg mission in different parts of the Empire, whether among the Czechs, Hungarians, Poles or Romanians.
The Yugoslav dimension is covered in detail. The book here supplies new material about the disunity - the diverse interpretations of a South Slav utopia - on the eve of an independent Yugoslav state. It does so in three inter-related contexts. Firstly (as Ian Armour notes) the subject is covered in the Italian context, chiefly through the confusion which emerged when Italians tried to formulate specifically Yugoslav propaganda for Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. It is clear that the Yugoslav ideal, propagated by a few influential enthusiasts, was anathema not just to many Italians but also to many Croats and Slovenes in Italian captivity. Two other contexts deserve attention because of their focus upon 'Yugoslavs' in the Monarchy itself. Thus, in a case study, a Croat division on the Italian front is examined in detail to reveal the mixture of Habsburg, Croatian and radical Yugoslav loyalties which prevailed there. Lastly, the hinterland Yugoslav agitation of 1917-18 is discussed, both as it evolved on the ground and how it was reported in enemy propaganda. The Slovene-led grass-roots 'declaration movement' (which is ignored in western historiography) was particularly important as a key basis for a new, if fragile, Yugoslav identity on Slovene-Croatian terms. Through the interaction of these three contexts - enemy, front, hinterland - the book seeks to explain why the Habsburg Empire slowly lost its legitimacy and collapsed at the end of the war.
As to the impact of front propaganda in this disintegration, I would confirm Ian Armour's suggestion that it worked 'in a limited sense'. It acted as a small catalyst upon the centrifugal trends in the Monarchy, or rather, upon the trend towards popular mobilisation around new (non-Habsburg) centres of unrest in the imperial provinces. It is a natural perhaps that one is urged to make a definitive pronouncement on the elusive question: whether or not propaganda was really effective. Thus Professor Holger Herwig has recently implied (in The Slavic Review, vol.60 no.3) that I fudge on committing myself in the book's conclusion. On the contrary, I am careful to show the limits of what we can ever deduce about the impact of such propaganda. In its written form, it probably had a minor effect in the Austrian trenches (as in the Italian trenches). But it certainly had potential for educated soldiers, in that it was repeating and mirroring the arguments already prevalent in the radical Habsburg press; this feeds into my emphasis on the Austro-Hungarian front and hinterland being closely intertwined. Where front propaganda was undoubtedly most effective was in the shape of the Czech legionaries who, I suggest (p.440), were 'the single most important piece of Italy's front propaganda', providing a real psychological presence opposite the Austrian front lines. It seems clear that this personal 'trench propaganda', when wielded on the Italian or Eastern fronts, always had a greater impact than the printed word. It was an extra tool in the armoury of military Intelligence; and its effect was more easily quantifiable than any propaganda manifestos. The importance of the latter is more subtle. They enable us to gauge mentalities and perceptions on both sides of the front. Through their language and images the leaflets reveal much about prevalent national stereotypes, and allow us to explore how and why these stereotypes took firmer root in the final years of the war. For it was through this negative 'imagining of the other' that the Monarchy in 1918 experienced a national polarisation and disintegrated.
In conclusion, my monograph sets out a number of fruitful lines for future historical enquiry. Firstly, the other contemporary campaigns of front propaganda now await similar detailed analysis, notably those on the Western front, in the Balkans and against Turkey. It was from this joint foundation that front propaganda achieved its reputation and thrived in the twentieth century: up to the current conflict in Afghanistan. Secondly, the Austro-Hungarian war effort would benefit from being approached with a more critically 'cultural' eye. This would bring to the subject the cultural dimension advocated by historians such as Jay Winter (but so far largely confined to the Western European experience). Thirdly, the book offers many new thoughts, some of which are summarised in chapters 2 and 7, about the short-term causes of the Habsburg Empire's collapse. One of my own future tasks is to provide a wider and longer-term context for the dissolution. Thereby we will be able to trace more clearly the disintegrative threads which the propaganda weapon began to pull at in the last years of the Monarchy's existence.