Focusing on the 20th century, this talk examines the process by which new peers’ titles were chosen and approved, the considerations which peers took into account and the principles which governed title selection. Garter King of Arms, who was charged with settling peers' titles on behalf of the Crown, had guidelines to help ensure that titles were dignified and distinctive, and peer-designates could be disappointed if he felt unable to approve their first choice. Consultation with other parties might also be required, yet even titles which secured approval sometimes generated criticism after being announced. This presentation will also consider how the guidelines developed and how peers’ title preferences evolved during this period.
Dr Duncan Sutherland is an independent historian and former research fellow at Queen's University Belfast's Centre for the Advancement of Women in Politics. His particular interests include women and the House of Lords, and heraldry. He has contributed articles for the History of Parliament and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
All welcome- this seminar is free to attend, but advance booking is required.